I got a fair amount of email about my post on new/old Venice mayor, Massimo Cacciari, specifically his apparent distain for Venice’s mass tourism. It’s the total opposite of what we expect mayors to do in the US. Here, in towns large and small, mayors are generally indiscriminate boosters of the “assets” of their cities, from fitness to hold the Olympics, the joy of local artichokes, the marvel of world’s tallest thermometer, or the wonders of a new industrial park built on a toxic dump.
If you’re looking for a balanced, objective picture of a city, look elsewhere. A mayor is the last person you should ask. They have to get re-elected.
Tourism is business, and business fuels jobs, and jobs mean votes. So it’s almost unheard -- politically suicidal — for a mayor to advocate less tourism. Is Cacciari a crank? After all, the tax revenues from the tourist trade no doubt pay a good chunk his salary.
And nobody wants to feel bad about visiting a place they love. I know you probably don’t feel like a scourge. Most days, neither do I.
I think that’s what rubbed some Veniceblog readers the wrong way: the implication that tourists (i.e., us) are a blight. Little Attilas, sacking and marauding in Nikes and fanny packs. Are we the enemy of Venice, for God’s sake? Impossible. We love the place. Excuse us for wanting to visit the most beautiful spot on the planet. We’ll just summer at the lake instead.
Let me set the record straight: Venice needs tourism. Most Venetians know this, including Cacciari, and do not see tourists as locusts. But there is a growing feeling that character of tourism in Venice is something needs to change, a feeling I share.
To oversimplify, it’s about too many people in too little space. You know the drill. Put forty kids in a classroom designed for twenty. Put ten people in a life-raft that accommodates five. Overfill a prison. Oversell a rock concert. We all agree this is bad. Anytime you cram too many living things into too small a space, you’ve got trouble on your hands. Often a fight.
If you have spent much time in Venice, you know that there are many, many occasions when the rising tide of humanity out-rivals the rising Adriatic. Endless queues that look like depression-era breadlines leading into the Basilica. The wide Paglia Bridge (overlooking the Bridge of Sighs) so jammed with humanity that it is all but uncrossable. Vaporettos that seem like refugee escape crafts, riding with their gunwales inches above the water, every nanometer filled. Calles so overfilled, city officials are forced to turn them in to one-way streets on an emergency basis.
There’s a phrase in Italian: “un bagno di folla” … essentially, “bathing in people”.
Now it gets tricky. If there are too many people, who, exactly, should be prevented/discouraged from coming in? And how? It’s not us, of course. Right? We’re the good guys. What should the city do? Field a lottery? An entrance exam? First come, first served? Charge an entrance fee? Reservations only? What?
My opinion, and that of many Venetians, is that there is a type of tourist the city could do without: ignorant ones. The day-trippers, many or most of who arrive in massive cruise ships. To many, many of these folks, Venice is merely another port-of-call. An amusement park that is there to entertain. They come to live the clichés … to say they’ve done it. Their knowledge of where they are -- their interest for understanding the context and history of the city -- is non-existent. They consume Venice like a box of bon-bons, in a single gluttonous session. They become the temporary majority population, and drown out the authentic character of the place. Venetians and travelers who came for enrichment seem like anonymous extras on a set. It’s morphed into Disneyland alright, complete with costumed characters, concessions, lines and rides.
This is why we loved living on La Giudecca. It was not a “popular ride”. Venetian life plays out there still (though like all things authentically Venetian, it’s endangered.) We tended to avoid the “bagno di folla” in San Marco during the day. To tell you the truth, we often laid low during the amateur hour of Carnevale, as did many Venetians we knew. Likewise, it’s one of the reasons I was compelled to buy a boat in Venice: to see the city authentically through the eyes of a pilot and to feel it from a hand on the tiller. I love the city in the dark hours of the morning, when you wander the calles with the ghosts and the cats. Or in the fog of November, when sensible hedonists are in Jamaica or Hawaii. That’s when the city springs back from the crushing weight of the mobs and you’ll see and feel something real.
Now perhaps Cacciari’s “don’t come to Venice” campaign begins to make more sense. (For the record, the campaign, which hasn’t been in place for years, was somewhere between tongue-in-cheek and half-serious.) He wasn’t telling us to leave the city alone. He was trying to repel those who were trying to make the choice between Knott’s Berry Farm, Great Adventure, Disneyworld or Venice.
And I’m with him.
Comments?
Recent Comments